<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#039;ve Come A Long Way, Dummy: 1960s GM Crash Test Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/</link>
	<description>The hottest place on the Web for fast, modified or exotic cars.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:09:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Not GM, it&#039;s UCLA test footage over the years; 1960, 1964, 1967 cars provided at the time for research by Chrysler &amp; Ford, or purchased with research grant money. 1960 &amp; 1964 tests were for unrestrained occupants, &#039;67 was more into head restraints and fuel tanks.
Note that the cars held up pretty well, considering the impact forces, but the occupants received little consideration until these films were made public back in the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not GM, it&#8217;s UCLA test footage over the years; 1960, 1964, 1967 cars provided at the time for research by Chrysler &amp; Ford, or purchased with research grant money. 1960 &amp; 1964 tests were for unrestrained occupants, &#8216;67 was more into head restraints and fuel tanks.<br />
Note that the cars held up pretty well, considering the impact forces, but the occupants received little consideration until these films were made public back in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-933</guid>
		<description>1) Who cares?

2) GM (probably) paid UCLA Science-Dudes to conduct the tests and UCLA used whatever clunkers they had on hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Who cares?</p>
<p>2) GM (probably) paid UCLA Science-Dudes to conduct the tests and UCLA used whatever clunkers they had on hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dculberson</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>dculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Etmccaus, I&#039;m going to guess that it&#039;s because the person that compiled the video didn&#039;t do their research quite thoroughly enough.

A lot of the cars say &quot;UCLA&quot; on them so that&#039;s probably who performed the tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Etmccaus, I&#8217;m going to guess that it&#8217;s because the person that compiled the video didn&#8217;t do their research quite thoroughly enough.</p>
<p>A lot of the cars say &#8220;UCLA&#8221; on them so that&#8217;s probably who performed the tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etmccaus</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Etmccaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question from a real dummy--if these were GM tests, why are they almost always running Mopar-on-Mopar (possibly Ford-on-Ford at one point) action?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question from a real dummy&#8211;if these were GM tests, why are they almost always running Mopar-on-Mopar (possibly Ford-on-Ford at one point) action?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s make that six times</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s make that six times</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Plumer</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Plumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 06:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Both entertaining and chilling at same time. I love classic cars but, this is reminder of how far we&#039;ve come as far as safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both entertaining and chilling at same time. I love classic cars but, this is reminder of how far we&#8217;ve come as far as safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-927</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s chilling yet also funny.  I&#039;d be curious to see a modern small car (say a Fit or something similar) be paired up with one of those behemoths in a head-on test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s chilling yet also funny.  I&#8217;d be curious to see a modern small car (say a Fit or something similar) be paired up with one of those behemoths in a head-on test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve watched it four times now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve watched it four times now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad_Science</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/05/weve-come-a-long-way-dummy-1960s-gm-crash-test-video/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad_Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=5588#comment-928</guid>
		<description>The guy falling out the door and getting run over is simultaneously awesome, hilarious and disturbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy falling out the door and getting run over is simultaneously awesome, hilarious and disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
