<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Brother Behind the Wheel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/07/big-brother-behind-the-wheel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/07/big-brother-behind-the-wheel/</link>
	<description>The hottest place on the Web for fast, modified or exotic cars.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:09:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe McDiarmid</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/07/big-brother-behind-the-wheel/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McDiarmid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=6565#comment-331</guid>
		<description>as with all tech- there are ways around it. 45 seconds? maybe if you&#039;re an electrical engineer. the average consumer can&#039;t change a tire, let alone wire around an ignition kill switch. incompatible? says who? it&#039;s software. Clearly if a killswitch is going to become mandatory then current keyless entry and ignition technology would still be adapted to work with it. 1 sober person with lungs? Why wouldn&#039;t that person just drive? you raise good points, but they&#039;re all easily and logically explained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as with all tech- there are ways around it. 45 seconds? maybe if you&#8217;re an electrical engineer. the average consumer can&#8217;t change a tire, let alone wire around an ignition kill switch. incompatible? says who? it&#8217;s software. Clearly if a killswitch is going to become mandatory then current keyless entry and ignition technology would still be adapted to work with it. 1 sober person with lungs? Why wouldn&#8217;t that person just drive? you raise good points, but they&#8217;re all easily and logically explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad_Science</title>
		<link>http://blog.webridestv.com/2009/07/big-brother-behind-the-wheel/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad_Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webridestv.com/?p=6565#comment-330</guid>
		<description>That tech would take all of 45 seconds to wire around...not to mention would be incompatible with newer keyless ignition systems.

Not to mention all you need is 1 sober person around with lungs to get around it.

These are the kinds of things that get lots of support by a few very narrowly-focused groups, but ultimately fail when exposed to the public at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That tech would take all of 45 seconds to wire around&#8230;not to mention would be incompatible with newer keyless ignition systems.</p>
<p>Not to mention all you need is 1 sober person around with lungs to get around it.</p>
<p>These are the kinds of things that get lots of support by a few very narrowly-focused groups, but ultimately fail when exposed to the public at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
